Ladbrokes and McClean bookmakers stop working to obstruct rival shops' growths
20 May 2013
Two bookmakers have failed in High Court quotes to block proposed extensions to rival betting shops in Belfast.
A judge dismissed attempts by both Ladbrokes and McClean bookmakers to judicially evaluate preparation decisions in favour of Toals and Sean Graham.
The judge at Belfast High Court stated he would provide reasons for his choice at a later stage.
The legal proceedings had been released over applications for the growth of two stores in the city centre.
The first, run by Toals in Pottinger's Entry, involves a proposal to extend out into the former passport workplace on High Street.
In the 2nd, Sean Graham is looking for to increase the space of its King Street betting office by taking control of a hairdressers on Castle Street.
'Disgruntled competitor'
Lawyers for Ladbrokes and McClean bookies declared both were attempting to get round a requirement of video gaming legislation to show demand.
During the case the 2 companies acknowledged their interest as business competitors.
Points were also raised about compliance with policies securing a conservation location.
But counsel for Sean Graham argued that the legal obstacle was the act of an unhappy rival, exclusively concerned with the impact on its own organization.
According to the Planning Service's legal agents, neither proposed development includes alterations to structures visible from the yohaig code street.
Following the decision, Sean Graham bookies, which employ 150 staff in 30 stores across Northern Ireland, outlined its blueprint for contemporary facilities and more jobs.
Speaking outside the court, basic manager Chris Deery said: "We are very eager to move on with our prepare for an extended King Street/Castle Street which will boost the consumer experience and aid to revitalise the immediate area in addition to bringing extra employment."
Mr Deery added that the company was now intending to continue with the extensions "as quickly as possible".
